Ordering through mini-programs is quick and convenient, and you can even get coupons, but once you place a wrong order and want a refund, you may run into obstacle after obstacle. Recently, a blogger mistakenly ordered 17 cups of coffee through the Luckin mini-program. Within one minute, they tried to cancel, only to find that the mini-program did not display the store’s phone number, while the headquarters customer service kept passing them back and forth through an intelligent robot. In the end, they had no choice but to bear the loss themselves. This incident struck a chord with many netizens, and quite a few shared similar experiences. Consumers are calling for store contact information to be made public or for the self-service refund function to be improved, while Luckin staff also said that stores cannot directly process refunds and that the procedure is cumbersome, expressing hope that the system can be optimized. When convenience and after-sales service become disconnected, how should brands balance efficiency and consumer rights? [more…]

Dai Wei, founder of ofo, saw his second entrepreneurial venture, About Time Coffee, reported to be on the verge of shutdown, with only one store left struggling to stay afloat in New York. This coffee chain brand, which once entered the US market with high cost-effectiveness and innovative products, expanded from five stores to four permanently closed in less than two years. Dai Wei tried to replicate Luckin Coffee's "burn money" playbook overseas but encountered difficulties adapting to local conditions. Meanwhile, more than 16 million users in China are still queuing to get their ofo deposits refunded, involving an amount as high as 1.5 billion yuan. The failure of this cross-industry entrepreneur once again brings public attention back to that unsettled debt and raises the question: is coffee entrepreneurship a trend or a trap? Front Street Coffee takes you through an in-depth analysis of the rise and fall of this cross-border venture. [more…]

As a prepaid card product launched by Starbucks, the Star Gift Card has long suffered from issues such as limited recharge amounts, excessively high card refund fees, and the inability to clear remaining balances. Four university students discovered during their consumption that when the remaining balance on a Star Gift Card was only 19 yuan, they could neither purchase any Starbucks product nor get a refund to clear the balance. After investigation, they found that the prepaid cards of several tea beverage brands did not have such restrictions. Therefore, in June 2023, they filed a lawsuit against Starbucks, ultimately prompting Starbucks to update the Star Gift Card terms, lower the card refund fee, eliminate the minimum charge, allow custom recharge amounts, and cancel the extension management fee. [more…]

Remember ofo? That once ubiquitous bike-sharing brand is still nowhere near refunding deposits, yet its founder Dai Wei has reportedly started a new venture in the US—this time in the coffee sector. It's said that Dai Wei founded About Time Coffee in New York, specializing in iced pearl coffee, where new users can get a free cup upon registration, mirroring the marketing tactics of ofo back in the day. As soon as the news broke, netizens clamored for their money back. Front Street Coffee takes you through the whole story. [more…]

A female customer nicknamed "Allergy Sister" by netizens has been requesting refunds at multiple independent coffee shops in Wuhan, claiming that lactose intolerance triggered an allergic reaction. At first, shop owners agreed out of apology and concern, until some in the trade discovered that the medical certificates were questionable and the accounts were strikingly similar, realizing that this might be a patterned refund claim. So far, more than twenty shops have come forward to confirm refunds, and the number of victims may still be growing. The person involved has deleted her account and cannot be reached, and some shop owners are gathering evidence and considering legal action to defend their rights. [more…]

Recently, a post about 1 Dian Dian's navy salt salted milk green tea charging an extra 2 yuan for added salt sparked widespread discussion on social media. Some customers, following online guides, asked for extra salt, only to be told that one pump of salt costs 2 yuan, which was far from their expectations. Subsequently, 1 Dian Dian employees and official customer service explained that the "salt" is actually a relatively expensive navy salt rock sugar flavor syrup, and according to company policy, additional additions require payment. Although the store has apologized for the incorrect price quote, netizens have derived a new question: since adding sugar costs money, should customers who order less sugar or no sugar also get a refund for the corresponding syrup price difference? This debate about the pricing logic of tea drinks quickly became a topic of interest for coffee and tea enthusiasts. [more…]

Recently, the "Allergy Sister" incident in Wuhan has sparked widespread attention in the coffee community, and similar phenomena of customers requesting refunds from merchants for various reasons are not uncommon in the food and beverage industry. Some coffee shop owners have reported encountering a customer who repeatedly applied for refunds on the grounds that the drinks' taste was not to their liking, suspected to be an "Allergy Sister alt account." Investigations revealed that this customer had placed orders at multiple shops and repeatedly applied for refunds, citing reasons such as the drink being too bland, too sweet, or too cloying. Some merchants chose to appease the customer to protect their reputation, but others refused to compromise and warned their peers to be vigilant. Such behavior not only harms merchants' interests but also encourages a culture of malicious claims. This article reviews the course of events and explores reasonable ways for merchants to defend their rights when responding to consumer complaints. [more…]

Starbucks Workers United has recently publicly expressed dissatisfaction with popular online secret menu items, pointing out that these complicated custom drinks place an added burden on baristas. As the #starbuckshack hashtag on platforms like TikTok approaches 5 billion views, more and more customers are bringing posts into stores and asking for them to be recreated, yet baristas often have never heard of the recipes and the ingredients are not fully available. Some baristas have to make a quarter or even two-thirds of their drinks as hidden custom orders every day, and if the final product does not match the picture, it may be refused or a refund may be demanded. This ordering trend, fueled by social media, not only tests baristas' ability to adapt, but also triggers complaints from ordinary consumers about longer wait times. [more…]

A Luckin Coffee drink from the Meteorite series ended up with a customer unable to suck up the meteorite toppings at the bottom of the cup because the barista had packed a thin straw. After contacting customer service, the customer actually received a full refund for the order. This handling quickly sparked discussion online: some felt the merchant's service was excellent, while others worried that such a "simple and粗暴" refund approach could set a bad example. Is it thoughtful service or excessive compensation? This small matter of giving the wrong straw reflects the different strategies and potential risks that chain coffee brands face in handling customer complaints. [more…]

Starbucks Japan recently issued an announcement admitting that from September 2014 to January 2024, 164 types of coffee beans across its nationwide stores were sold above their listed prices due to a defect in the cash register system settings. Over the ten-year period, a total of 5,896 bags of affected products were sold, with overcharges amounting to 124,033 yen. The company has corrected the system and issued an apology, while offering three refund options: stored-value card members will automatically receive the difference back, while other customers need to bring a receipt or provide purchase information to handle it at the counter. Netizens generally believe the time span is too long and the amounts too small, and suggest apologizing with more practical compensation such as drink vouchers. [more…]

A customer purchased a Starbucks Frappuccino coupon on Meituan, successfully placed an order and received a pickup code, but upon walking to the store to collect the drink, discovered that the store had already closed down. The store's phone was disconnected, and Starbucks customer service and Meituan customer service passed the buck to each other over refund responsibility, leaving the consumer in a predicament. An investigation revealed that the store is located at Suning Plaza on Jiefang Road in Xi'an, where the mall is undergoing comprehensive renovation, and the store has actually ceased operations—yet the official app still showed it as open, and orders could even be placed through "Feikuai." Ultimately, after the customer's feedback, Starbucks shut down the ordering channel, Meituan refunded the order amount and stopped delivery services. The incident also sparked discussions among netizens about wrong-store pickup services and the 12315 complaint channel. [more…]

Since its launch in 2022, Jasmine Naibai's signature drink, Pistachio Jasmine Coconut, has been deeply loved by consumers for its unique combination of pistachio milk cap and jasmine coconut water. However, recently many takeout customers have reported that after pouring the separately packaged milk cap into the drink, it actually sank to the bottom of the cup, and the coconut water became cloudy and even had suspended particles. The brand's customer service responded that "it did not meet our production standards" and processed refunds for some consumers. Why did the milk cap fail? Was it delivery delays, stores rushing orders, or a change in ingredients? As takeout orders surge, Jasmine Naibai's quality control issues continue to intensify, with complaints such as milk caps sinking, wrong ingredients added, and too few toppings constantly emerging. Consumers cannot help but ask: can we still drink a normal cup of milk tea? [more…]

Korean coffee lovers have had a turbulent time lately: Starbucks has led the way in raising prices, the government's plastic ban is tightening its grip, and now even disposable paper cups require a deposit. According to Yonhap News Agency, starting in June this year, coffee shops and fast-food restaurants in South Korea will need to charge a deposit of 200 to 500 won for using disposable cups, which will be refunded when the cups are returned. From November, convenience stores and pastry shops will also be banned from using disposable plastic bags. Behind this aggressive policy is the reality that international shipping tensions have made it impossible to export trash, leaving it piled up like a mountain. Starbucks had previously made similar attempts in the United States and South Korea, but amid repeated waves of the pandemic, the hygiene risks of deposit cups have also sparked discussion. If it were you, would you pay a deposit for a disposable cup? [more…]

The Manner Coffee collaboration ceramic cup with WEDGWOOD, a British Royal Warrant brand, officially launched on March 4th, limited to 50,000 units, and quickly ignited social networks. However, on the first day of the event, the Manner mini-program crashed due to excessive traffic, and some consumers who successfully placed orders encountered automatic system refunds and had their orders canceled; others, when purchasing the drip bag cup set, discovered that the complimentary gift had a production date of last November, suspected to be inventory clearance. At the same time, there were also lucky ones who successfully got their desired collaboration items. This collaboration event can be described as full of twists and turns, showcasing the brand's appeal while also exposing shortcomings in its service. As coffee lovers, while paying attention to the hype, we might also take note of the stable quality experience offered by brands like Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Manner partnered with the Museum of Art Pudong to launch a promotion where buying two new drinks earns a "Woman Knight" canvas tote bag. The offer was limited to one day and only 10,000 bags nationwide, triggering a buying frenzy. However, many customers had their orders automatically canceled by the system after successful payment, or were told upon arriving at the store that the gifts were already gone, resulting in a terrible experience. Netizens questioned whether stores had stocked too few bags, whether the system inventory matched reality, and some even suspected the gifts were flowing onto second-hand platforms to be resold at high prices. This is not the first time Manner has been criticized over gift inventory issues, dealing another heavy blow to brand goodwill. Front Street Coffee is following this incident and walks you through how it unfolded. [more…]

Coffee chain giant Starbucks has once again become the focus of public opinion, this time due to a Douyin platform promotion offering coupons for two Flat White coffees for 0.01 yuan. After grabbing the coupons, many consumers were told they could not be redeemed and the system automatically refunded them, sparking widespread dissatisfaction. Starbucks subsequently issued an apology, explaining that an internal test link had been mistakenly activated. However, the incident did not die down, as legal experts pointed out that the merchant's unilateral cancellation of the contract may constitute a breach. Meanwhile, Starbucks is accelerating expansion and adjusting its marketing strategy in the Chinese market, frequently launching promotional offers. This article reviews the course of the incident, the reactions of various parties, and Starbucks' recent moves. Front Street Coffee also continues to follow developments in the coffee industry. [more…]

Recently, a consumer in Shanghai found a large fly in an iced Americano purchased from a Peet's Coffee store, sparking widespread attention. The customer said the cup lid was sealed and the store environment was good, and they only noticed the foreign object with the last sip. Although the store offered to remake the drink and issue a refund, the customer refused the refund and demanded a thorough investigation into the cause. After regulators stepped in to inspect, they said the clarity of the surveillance footage was limited and they could not confirm whether there was a problem during the preparation process. The store involved responded that the ice machine is cleaned on a regular schedule and that it is currently cooperating with the investigation. The incident continued to intensify on social media, and the customer has deleted the original post. [more…]

Recently, a Mixue Bingcheng store in Shenyang made trending news after a dispute broke out between a staff member and a customer. According to a report by Xiaoxiang Morning Herald, a woman ordered three drinks in advance but was delayed by more than ten minutes after going to the wrong store. When she arrived, she was unable to get the drinks that had already been made, and then got into an argument with a male employee, who even made harsh remarks such as "Eat it if you want, if not, get out." After the incident video was exposed, it sparked widespread discussion among netizens. Some criticized the employee's poor service attitude, while others pointed out that freshly made iced drinks have their own reasonable preparation requirements, but more people believed that the responsibility of both sides needed to be judged based on the full sequence of events. At present, the employee involved has been fired by the store and has compensated the customer. [more…]

During the Double Eleven shopping festival, many consumers, in order to use platform coupons, adopt a method of first adding extra items to reach the threshold and then requesting a refund, so as to buy their desired products at a lower price. This practice, known as the "big promotion add-on refund trick," was originally seen mostly on online shopping platforms, but has now quietly appeared in the tea beverage delivery industry. Recently, a milk tea shop employee posted a customer order, with notes requesting that the toppings not be packed separately and intending to request a refund afterward, which left the employee and netizens astonished. The incident sparked widespread discussion, with netizens both curious about the feasibility of the operation and expressing sympathy for the merchants and employees. This article will recount the incident and analyze the platform rules and industry dilemmas behind this phenomenon. [more…]

A super value 5-time card launched on Luckin Coffee's Tmall flagship store quickly triggered a buying frenzy because it was priced as low as 13.77 yuan for any 5 cups chosen from 15 classic drinks. However, in the early hours of the next day, many consumers had their orders forcibly refunded by the platform on the grounds of "no longer wanted" without any refund operation on their part, and some, although shown as shipped, did not receive the electronic vouchers. Luckin later explained that a system configuration error had triggered automatic refunds and offered a 32-yuan drink voucher as compensation. But some consumers were not convinced, believing that the brand's unilateral cancellation of the contract amounted to a breach of contract or even fraud, and have filed lawsuits in court demanding reasonable compensation. The incident exposed the performance risks in the sale of electronic discount vouchers and the issue of consumer rights protection. [more…]